The Christian Broadcasting Network

Erick Stakelbeck

The Stakelbeck on Terror Frontpage

 

 

Stakelbeck on Terror

 

 

August 15, 2005

TSA to Recommend Lifting Bans on Carry-on Items

Chances are, unless you're an air traffic control groupie (a very exclusive group indeed), you've never heard of Edmund S. "Kip" Hawley. But Hawley, who was just appointed by President Bush to head the Transportation Security Administration, may soon become a household name, thanks to some truly outrageous proposals put forth by his staff recently, per his request. Seems the folks at TSA have some recommendations on how to improve upon the airline security measures put in place following the 9-11 attacks. They include-and I'm not making this up-lifting the ban on carry-on items such as scissors, razor blades, and knives less than five inches long. Apparently, the fact that the 9-11 hijackers used box cutters to commandeer the planes used in that day's attacks has slipped the TSA's memory banks.

But it gets even more bizarre: the TSA has also suggested that ice picks, throwing stars, and--brace yourself--bows and arrows should be allowed on flights as well. Now, if I didn't know better, I'd think this was some sort of twisted practical joke the TSA threw out to tweak the American public and liven up the dog days of summer. And yet, there it was, all meticulously outlined in an August 5 TSA memo leaked by The Washington Post. Call me crazy, but the thought of being seated next to a man with an ice pick in his bag on my flights out of Washington, D.C. doesn't make me feel more secure. And with the fourth anniversary of 9/11 fast approaching, the TSA's proposals seem that much more baffling, ill-timed, and inappropriate.

The TSA's thinking here is to make airline screeners' and passengers' lives, not to mention the general flying experience, easier and less intrusive by not conducting unnecessary searches. Hence, another new TSA proposal recommends only those passengers who set off metal detectors or are flagged by a computer screening system should have to remove their shoes when passing through airport security. Does this mean that we'll no longer be treated to the spectacle of 80-year-old Irish nuns being pulled out of line for the once-over by security while 25-year-old, bearded fellows from Saudi Arabia waltz right through and collect their carry-on bags (which, apparently, may soon include throwing stars and bows and arrows)?

Let's face it: removing one's shoes is a small price to pay when compared with the possible alternative: an Islamic terrorist getting the bright idea--much like the would-be "shoe bomber," Richard Reid, did just after 9-11--of slipping a deadly substance into his Nikes to take on board a flight. Interestingly enough, Department of Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff recently announced that passengers no longer have to stay in their seats during the first and last 30 minutes of flights using Reagan National Airport. So potential terrorists now have an official one-hour window to hop out of their seats and wreak havoc on flights in and out of D.C. I think I speak for a majority Americans, to put it mildly, when I say that I'm willing to give up minor perks such as using the bathroom prior to landing if it will prevent a potential terrorist attack. Here's hoping that Edmund Hawley is listening.

EMail Erick Stakelbeck With Your Comments ...

 

Do You Know Jesus
Grow In Your Faith

Need Prayer?

Call 1-800-700-7000
Email your prayer request

Email iconSign up for E-mail Updates Full List

 E-mail: